Rastafarian boys’ case was too obvious for court dispute’ – Nana Sekyere Boateng

A private legal practitioner and second vice chairman of NPP in Bono East region, Lawyer Nana Sekyere Boateng , says the case between the Rastafarian boys and Achimota School was “too plain” for a court dispute.

The two boys, Tyrone Marhguy and Oheneba Nkrabea, had been denied admission into the school for refusing to cut off their dreadlocks which is in conformity with their Rastafarian religion.

The Private Legal Practitioner, Nana Sekyere Boateng, speaking to urgued that the “constitution is clear in Article 28 and 21 that you don’t use somebody’s religion to discriminate against the person. Article 21 is clear that there is freedom of religion.”

Read Also:  Ban on Weddings, Parties, concert until further notice - Akuffo-Addo

He added that “for the avoidance of doubt, Article 28 makes it clearer that don’t deprive a child of education, medical treatment or any social or economic benefit on grounds of the religion of the child.”
Nana Boateng commended the High Court for ruling in favour of the Rastafarian boys, stating that “it is good that the judge has upheld the law.”

Read Also:  WhatsApp to switch off messages for all who reject new terms

On the issue of uniformity in schools, Nana Boateng said “the law for good reasons has made a religious exception.”
Everything on JUMIA/><
Nana Sekyere Boateng says the Rastafarian boys’ case against Achimota was solely on religious grounds and “Let’s allow the constitution to lead,” he advised.

Sourcetrustfmonline.

Related posts

3 Thoughts to “Rastafarian boys’ case was too obvious for court dispute’ – Nana Sekyere Boateng

Leave a Comment